Hi @Martin-Kudláček ,
Sorry to wake this one up again.
But i hope you can reassure me a little bit more.
This high load kind of freaks me out, so i would really like to put a finger on whats happening
I have a lot of Neurons running (at least 15+) with very low load averages, always under 0,10
I also have a lot of (newer) Neurons running (some 20+) with very high load averages, like @cristian mentioned, way above 1,20
I haven't got influxdb running on those, and i'm not doing weird things as far as i know.
The only obvious difference I can find is that in the low-load unipi's ther's still the old drivers called NEURONSPI, and in the high-load unipi's they are called UNIPISPI.
I'm not sure this is the culprit, but it seems that the OS version is not really an issue
I have Debian stretch on the older ones, with low load, but i have also stretch installs that show the high load.
All unipi's with Buster have the high load for sure, but they're all UNIPISPI according to dmesg
Is there anything you are aware of that justifies the load difference between UNIPISPI and NEURONSPI?
Or do i have to look further... Or should i really not worry about this?
Most of these unipi's are in production environments long drives away, so if there's something to be fixed i would try to get that done before they break...
Thanks a lot, Tony, Fireware Netherlands
![alt text](![image url](0_1576594527207_IMAGE 2019-12-17 15:55:04.jpg image url))