Charlyplexing or matrix

[tomas_hora]

Hello @Wim-Stockman,

charlieplexing is not possible with digital inputs of UniPi. However matrix is OK, you just need the SW that will take care of decoding the states of inputs.

[Wim Stockman]

Hello,

Thx for the quick reply. I was thinking of using the keypad arduino library as a base for making the matrix scanner. Do you think this might work ?.
It would be great if I get it do work. Would mean you have suddenly 49 inputs available.
I think that will be enough for my house :-).

Kind regards
Wim Stockman

[tomas_hora]

@Wim-Stockman Basically yes. What interface to the DIs do you plan to use? Direct GPIOs on the RPi or websocket...?

[Wim Stockman]

@tomas_hora I 'll try direct gpio with the pigpio.I found something on the forum to get started. So I 'll try over the weekend if I get something working :-)

[tomas_hora]

@Wim-Stockman Good luck! Would be great it you share some results :)

[Wim Stockman]

Hi,
I run into a stupid problem.
trying the example of connecting with python through websocket.
I get this error : File "test.py", line 20, in <module>
ws = websocket.WebSocketApp(url, on_message = on_message, on_error = on_error, on_close = on_close)
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'WebSocketApp'

I don't know what I'm doing wrong , just copy paste the example check the ip adres (just localhost) but I seem stuck.
could you help me ?
thx

[Wim Stockman]

@Wim-Stockman Ok found the solution
uninstall websocket: sudo apt-get uninstall python-websocket
and install : sudo pip install websocket-client

this does the trick for me :-)

[Wim Stockman]

It seems the get attribute isn't implemented for the relays
and if I do a full request it gets dump on de command line in evok.py instead of sent to the websocketclient.
So I could initialise the position of the relays

import websocket
import json
import time
import threading

url = "ws://127.0.0.1/ws"
i = 0
relaystatus = [0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]

#initiliaze relay 3 just for demo purpose
wsinit = websocket.create_connection("ws://127.0.0.1/ws")
time.sleep(2)
wsinit.send('{"cmd":"full","dev":"relay","circuit":"3"}')
result = json.loads(wsinit.recv())
relaystatus[2] = result["value"]
print relaystatus
wsinit.close()

def on_message(ws, message):
    obj = json.loads(message);
    dev = obj['dev'];
    print obj['dev'];
    circuit = obj['circuit'];
    value = obj['value'];
    global i
    global relaystatus
    i += 1
    print i
    if dev == 'input' and i > 2:
        print "erin";
        ws1 = websocket.WebSocket();
        ws1.connect(url);
        #sending messages
        print obj['value'];
        if relaystatus[2] == 0:
                ws1.send('{"cmd":"set","dev":"relay","circuit":"3","value":"1"}')
                relaystatus[2] = 1
        else:
                ws1.send('{"cmd":"set","dev":"relay","circuit":"3","value":"0"}')
                relaystatus[2] = 0

        i = 0

    print message



def on_error(ws, error):
    print error

def on_close(ws):
    print "Connection closed"



#receiving messages
ws = websocket.WebSocketApp(url, on_message = on_message, on_error = on_error, on_close = on_close)
wst = threading.Thread(target=ws.run_forever())
wst.daemon = True
wst.start()
while not  ws.sock.connected:
        time.sleep(5)

This demo work for a push button that's why I have the 2 counter to activate the relay , because rising edge triggers a message as well as the falling edge. But that will come in handy for detecting how long somebody presses de button.

Somebody know where I can begin to omplent the Get for the relays.

Kind regards,
Wim

[tomas_hora]

@Wim-Stockman Thanks for the report. See this modification of the on_message function:

            try:
                device = Devices.by_name(dev, circuit)
                # result = device.set(value)
                func = getattr(device, cmd)
                if value is not None:
                    result = func(value)
                else:
                    result = func()
                if is_future(result):
                    result = yield result
                #devents.status(device)
                self.write_message(result)
                #print json.dumps(result)
            except Exception, E:
                print E
 

It will send the result of the command to only the client that send the command. But in our test, you are using two clients, so you will not receive the result in the other client. If you want to send the result to all clients connected to the WebSocket, use the devevents.satus(device) insted.

Working example of the test client:

import websocket
import json
import time
import threading

url = "ws://127.0.0.1/ws"
i = 0
relaystatus = [0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]

#initiliaze relay 3 just for demo purpose
wsinit = websocket.create_connection("ws://127.0.0.1/ws")
time.sleep(2)
wsinit.send('{"cmd":"full","dev":"relay","circuit":"3"}')
while True:
  result = json.loads(wsinit.recv())
  if result['dev'] == 'relay':
    print result
wsinit.close()

I will commit it in the first week of January.

[Wim Stockman]

Hi thx,

This works !
But now I get a weird exception on the evok.py on line 140 it throws an exception:
I get "Expected bytes, unicode, or None; got <type 'int'>"
Each time I sent a message : wsinit.send('{"cmd":"set","dev":"relay","circuit":"3","value":"1"}')

It's like it iterates twice over the on_message loop

my demo code is

import websocket
import json
import time
import threading

url = "ws://127.0.0.1:8088/ws"
i = 0
global relaystatus
relaystatus = [0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]

#initiliaze relay 3 just for demo purpose
wsinit = websocket.create_connection("ws://127.0.0.1:8088/ws")
time.sleep(2)
wsinit.send('{"cmd":"full","dev":"relay","circuit":"3"}')
result = json.loads(wsinit.recv())
relaystatus[2]=result["value"]
while True:

  result = json.loads(wsinit.recv())
  if result['dev'] == 'input':
        if relaystatus[2]==0 :
           wsinit.send('{"cmd":"set","dev":"relay","circuit":"3","value":"1"}')
           relaystatus[2] = 1
        else:
           wsinit.send('{"cmd":"set","dev":"relay","circuit":"3","value":"0"}')
           relaystatus[2] = 0

  print result

wsinit.close()

Thanks for the great help already :-)
Wim

[tomas_hora]

@Wim-Stockman I saw your pull request.. Did you find out what it was with the Expected bytes, unicode, or None; got <type 'int'>"? On what code did it crash?

[Wim Stockman]

So I found the problem, solved it and put a pull request in github.

made a little change in the evok.py.

#adding support to get state of relays using full msg in cmd 
           if cmd == "full":
                 self.write_message(result)

[Wim Stockman]

@tomas_hora yes the on_events routing fired a new message for the status change of the relay which was captured by the on_message and since it just sented a 0 or 1 the on_message gave this weird thing

[Wim Stockman]

This post is deleted!

[Wim Stockman]

So I finished the hardware part for the input plexing.
I used a variation on the charlyplexing.

In the example breadboard I only used 4 digital inputs (symbolized by the Leds), the 12V Vcc is symbolized by the battery and 8 pushbutton : https://circuits.io/circuits/3580634-stockmaninputplexing.

You could attach up to 15 pushbuttons on 4 digital inputs with this method. It is just some binary logic behind and a lot of diodes :-)
The purple wires are connected to an input just directly. (you could place diodes for safety)
and the next 6 pushbuttons are connected through 2 wires.
If you want 4 more pushbuttons you should combine 3 wires
and for the last one you need 4 wires.

So in theory with this method you could make 16383 different input combinations with this method.
I think it will not be practical but with 2 wires you can easily attach up to (14²-1) 195 pushbuttons with each different reactions.
So know I will create a python class to handle these inputs using the websocket method :-)

[Wim Stockman]

Hello,

Is there a possibility to receive the inputs via websocket with timestamps.
I know the pigpio librabry does this, but since the new neurons don't work anymore with pigpio. I was wondering if this is possible would be easy to detect , long pressed buttons etc...

[Wim Stockman]

Hello,
I have written some code to detect two inputs simultaniously activated through websocket.
Here is the code

#timingclass
import websocket
import threading
import datetime
import json
import time



url = "ws://192.168.1.104:8088/ws"


class DI:
		
	
	def __init__(self,circuit,value,timestamp):		
		self.circuit = circuit
		self.value = value
		self.timestamp = timestamp						
		self.longpress = 0
		self.doubletap = 0
		
		
		
class homecontrol:
	def __init__(self,websock_evok_url):
		
		self.status = 0
		self.digitalinput_list = [[0,0],[0,0]] # create list with timestamp inputs
		self.timeout = 1000				
		self.websock_evok_url = websock_evok_url	
		
		#connect to websocket and spawn message thread		
		self.ws = websocket.WebSocketApp(url, on_message = self.on_message, on_error = self.on_error, on_close = self.on_close)
		self.wst = threading.Thread(target=self.ws.run_forever())		
		self.wst.daemon = True
		self.wst.start()
		
		
	def time_stamp_inputs(self):
			t = datetime.datetime.now()
			t = (t.second * 1000)+(t.microsecond / 1000)								
			return t
					

	def detect_if_pressed_together(self):				
		d1 = self.digitalinput_list[0]
		d2 = self.digitalinput_list[1]
		# must be two different inputs and the same values you cannot press and unpress at the same time
		if d1.circuit != d2.circuit and d1.value == d2.value:		
				t = d1.timestamp -d2.timestamp		
				if t < self.timeout:				
					return 1			
				else:
					return 0

		
	def on_message(self,ws, message):		
			self.obj = json.loads(message)
			print self.obj
			self.dev = self.obj["dev"]
			self.circuit = self.obj["circuit"]
			self.value = self.obj['value']		
			if self.dev == "input" and self.value == 1 :											
				digitalinput = DI(self.circuit,self.value,self.time_stamp_inputs())			
				self.digitalinput_list.insert(0,digitalinput)

				if(self.detect_if_pressed_together()):					
					l = (self.digitalinput_list[0].circuit,self.digitalinput_list[1].circuit)
					l = sorted(l)					
					x = str(l[0])+str(l[1])						
					self.digitalinput_list[0].circuit = int(x)
					x = self.digitalinput_list[0]
					proc = threading.Thread(target=self.proceed_input,args=(x,))
					proc.start()
					

					
					
	def detect_long_press_of_button(self):
		pass
	
	
	
	def proceed_input(self,I):# SETUP a method to declare what to do which each function , was thinking of using codeblocks for this part ?		  
		  if I.circuit == 17:			  
			  print I.circuit
			  relay = 5
			  t = threading.Thread(target=self.switch_rel,args=(relay,))
			  #t = threading.Thread(target=switch_on_off_relay,args=(relay,))
			  t.start()
			  print "thread"
			  
			
		  if I.circuit == 26:	
			  print "26"
			  relay = 1
			  c = threading.Thread(target=self.switch_rel,args=(relay,))			  
			  c.start()
			  print "thread2"
			  
			  
	def on_error(self,ws,error):
			print "error"
			print error

	def on_close(self,ws):
			print "connection closed"
			
	def switch_rel(self,c):		
		relaynumber = c
		self.ws.send('{"cmd":"set","dev":"relay","circuit":"'+str(relaynumber)+'","value":"0"}')
		
		#else:
		#		self.ws.send('{"cmd":"set","dev":"relay","circuit":"'+str(relaynumber)+'","value":"0"}')
		#		self.status = 1
		


# SETUP a method to declare what to do which each function , was thinking of using codeblocks for this part ?		  				



def switch_on_off_relay(c):
			print c
			relaynumber = c
			url = "ws://192.168.1.104:8088/ws"		
			ws = websocket.create_connection(url)		
			print "swdf"
			ws.send('{"cmd":"set","dev":"relay","circuit":"'+str(relaynumber)+'","value":"1"}')
			
			ws.send('{"cmd":"set","dev":"relay","circuit":"'+str(relaynumber)+'","value":"0"}')
			
			ws.close
			pass

       	

x = homecontrol(url)	

But I have a problem that some inputs when they are to fast one after each other get forgetten.
and if I do none multithreading it does do al the steps but then one push may hold the others so not good.
Can somebody help me ?

[tomas_hora]

@Wim-Stockman I will take a look at it during the next week. Thanks for the tip.

I did not check the code much but there should be some time buffer while decoding the correct input. The messages does not always come at the same time, there might be a tens of ms gap between each and you shoudl tie those together...